'Slow Horses' Just Set Up 6 Unexpected Season 7 Mysteries

    &lt;<img src="https://static0.colliderimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/slow-horses-6-kristin-scott-thomas-diana-taverner.jpg?q=49&fit=crop&w=825&dpr=2" />
    Image via Apple TV</figure>

Sneaky sneaky! With great power comes very little responsibility, apparently, because it seems that First Desk Diana Taverner might be getting away with murder. It’s no secret that she is ruthless, but her clandestine wheeling and dealing set off a chain of unfortunate events. After a Novichok attack on British soil killed a civilian, Diana secretly ordered an off-the-books assassination of a woman connected to Russian intelligence using unofficial money tied to Damien Cantor (Harry Lloyd) and politician Peter Judd (Samuel West). To hide the identity of the agent who carried out the hit, Diana used Sid Baker’s identity and subsequently tried to erase Sid’s records. This was the catalyst that forced the Slough House agents to go on the run. Trying to cover herself, Taverner appeased senior GRU officer Vassily Rasnokov (Merab Ninidze) by willingly handing over Sid. Except here comes Jackson Lamb to the rescue!

With Lamb back on Taverner’s case, knowing she’s behind the cover-up, he’s back in control of their balance of power. He won’t let her go down; he’s got one up on her. But he’s not the only one who helped Taverner lose control. Judd leaves her vulnerable to blackmail, and she realizes that accepting private-sector and political strings has severely compromised her grip as First Desk. Even though she knows she’s compromised and a major threat to national security, her position still carries weight. After the Home Secretary chastises her, she says she’s shown a mix of brilliant strategy and appalling judgment, but she still gets the go-ahead to move on with Judd’s alleged treason. This will likely propel her narrative into the next season. For those who paid close attention to the Season 7 preview, Taverner does a fair bit of groundwork outside the office, even meeting Lamb at a laundromat. It’s safe to assume she’s ready to slum it to keep her hands clean.

Six actors. One role. Your answers point to the Bond who shares your presence, your method, and your particular way of carrying the weight of being the most dangerous person in the room.

You are the original — and you carry that fact without needing to announce it. There is an authority in the way you occupy a room that others spend careers trying to replicate.

• You don’t explain yourself, justify yourself, or soften yourself for anyone’s comfort. The confidence is structural, not performed.
• Connery’s Bond established everything — the tone, the danger, the cool — because Connery himself had the innate presence to make something that had never existed feel inevitable.
• You share that quality: the sense that you were always going to end up exactly here, doing exactly this.
• The name is Bond. In your case, it always was.

You understand something that more serious people miss: that wit is its own form of intelligence, and that making people laugh is not a retreat from danger but a way of mastering it.

• Moore’s Bond is underrated precisely because the effortlessness looks easy — and effortlessness is the hardest thing to manufacture.
• You have the same quality: a lightness that disarms people before they realise how sharp you actually are.
• The raised eyebrow, the perfectly timed quip, the refusal to be rattled — these are not affectations. They are a philosophy about how to move through a world that would like to take itself too seriously.
• You have never let it.

You took the role seriously when everyone wanted you to coast — and that refusal to take the easy version of anything is the most defining thing about you.

• Dalton’s Bond has genuine moral weight: he feels the cost of what he does, he has lines he won’t cross, and he is not interested in the version of himself that pretends otherwise.
• You share that intensity. You push harder than the situation technically requires, because you have a standard and you hold yourself to it.
• He was ahead of his time — the Bond the franchise wasn’t quite ready for yet, arriving exactly when he was meant to.
• You know what that feels like.

You are the complete package — and you know it, which is part of what makes you so effective and occasionally so infuriating to the people around you.

• Brosnan arrived at the role looking exactly like Bond was supposed to look, and he delivered on that expectation with a professionalism that made it seem effortless.
• You have the same quality: a smooth competence, a charm that operates like a precision instrument, and the ability to make even difficult things look like they weren’t.
• His era was the most commercially successful in the franchise’s history. There is a reason for that.
• The reason is that some people simply fit their moment perfectly. You are one of those people.

You stepped into something enormous with less preparation than anyone around you thought was sufficient — and you delivered something genuine anyway, which is the more impressive achievement.

• Lazenby’s single outing is, by many measures, one of the finest Bond films ever made — and he is not a small part of why.
• You share his quality of raw authenticity: less polished than the alternatives, more honest for it, capable of something real that technique alone can’t produce.
• He was underestimated, and then he wasn’t, and then history caught up with him.
• You are the kind of person history catches up with. Give it time.

You stripped everything back and found what was underneath — and what was underneath was harder, more honest, and more human than anyone expected.

• Craig’s Bond is the franchise’s most psychologically complete: a man doing a brutal job, carrying its costs imperfectly, capable of love and loss in ways that can’t be dismissed.
• You share that depth. You don’t hide behind the role or the charm or the suit — you let the work show what it actually costs.
• He was controversial from the moment he was announced and definitive by the time he was finished. The sceptics became the believers.
• That arc — of being underestimated and then undeniable — is one you know intimately.

Have We Seen the Last of Louisa Guy at Slough House?

    &lt;<img src="https://static0.colliderimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/slow-horses-6-rosalind-eleazar-louisa-guy.jpg?q=49&fit=crop&w=825&dpr=2" />
    Image via Apple TV</figure>

    &lt;<img src="https://static0.colliderimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/slow-horses-6-hugo-weaving-frank-harkness.jpg?q=49&fit=crop&w=825&dpr=2" />
    Image via Apple TV</figure>

    &lt;<img src="https://static0.colliderimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/slow-horses-6-harry-lloyd-damien-cantor.jpg?q=49&fit=crop&w=825&dpr=2" />
    Image via Apple TV</figure>