Elon Musk said control of OpenAI should go to his children, Sam Altman tells jury


51 minutes agoShareSaveAdd as preferred on GoogleLily Jamali,North America Technology correspondentandKali Hays,Technology reporter

grey-placeholder Elon Musk said control of OpenAI should go to his children, Sam Altman tells juryc5360200-4e2a-11f1-a6a1-c1a2c5a4cd39.jpg Elon Musk said control of OpenAI should go to his children, Sam Altman tells juryReuters
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman

Elon Musk tried to take control of OpenAI, even suggesting it could pass to his children when he dies, Sam Altman said on Tuesday.

Altman is co-founder and chief executive of the artificial intelligence (AI) company behind ChatGPT. He is being sued by Musk, who accuses him of having “looted a charity” given OpenAI began as a non-profit.

Appearing before a federal jury in Oakland, California, Altman said Musk not only backed the idea of OpenAI becoming a for-profit business, he wanted control of it for the long-run.

“A particularly hair-raising moment was when my cofounders asked, ‘If you have control, what happens when you die?’ He said something like ‘…maybe it should pass to my children.'”

The alleged comments from Musk came as the billionaire was trying to get more control of OpenAI after it was founded in 2015, and had floated several ways of gaining it.

More Hot Update :  Spain's 2026 World Cup home kit leaked

As well as wanting more seats on OpenAI’s board and to become its chief executive, Altman said Musk suggested OpenAI become a subsidiary of Tesla, his electric vehicle company.

The overarching goal for OpenAI was getting “more money faster”, Altman said on Tuesday, recalling conversations that involved Musk about the company restructuring to become a more traditional for-profit entity.

Musk allegedly felt he should be in charge of such a company, in part because of his fame as a business person who could help OpenAI get financial backing.

“If I make one tweet about this, it’s instantly worth a ton,” Altman recalled Musk saying.

But Altman said he, as well as OpenAI co-founders Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever, decided handing Musk such control in exchange for more or easier financing would not help OpenAI’s mission or its pursuit of artificial general intelligence, or AGI.

More Hot Update :  'Scary, cold, hungry and lonely': Volunteer soldier shares experience on front line

“I was extremely uncomfortable with it,” Altman said. “One of the reasons we started OpenAI was because we didn’t think any one person should be in control of AGI.”

AGI is loosely defined in the tech and AI community as an AI tool or model that becomes so capable and “intelligent” that it outperforms humans on most tasks.

Ultimately, Musk left OpenAI in early 2018 and stopped his quarterly donations of $5 million to the company.

Altman described as “burned into my memory” an email from Musk in which he said OpenAI “had a zero percent chance, not a one percent chance, of success” without him.

When Altman offered Musk the option of investing in OpenAI when it formed a for-profit subsidiary in 2019, Musk declined.

More Hot Update :  Here's the real reason to turn on airplane mode when you fly

“He said no because he would no longer invest in any startups he didn’t control,” Altman said.

Why Sam Altman and his former hero Elon Musk are taking their toxic feud to court

Former OpenAI board member says Elon Musk offered her sperm donations

The no-nonsense judge calling the shots in Musk v Altman trial

Elon Musk and Tim Cook among CEOs expected to accompany Trump on China trip

Elon MuskArtificial intelligence

Show Some Love By Sharing

Discover more from NAIRAVOICE.COM.NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply